Aries: need reassurance. They put up a tough front, but they secretly crave to be told they’re doing ok. Their resting bitch face only hides their fear of disappointing the ones they love.
Taurus: are unaware that sometimes, they are the source of the problem. Taurus do not intentionally play the victim, they just sometimes feel like their world is falling apart and can’t figure out what they did wrong.
Gemini: they want a deep connection with someone. They just want to find that special someone who will hold their attention long enough and will accept them completely.
Cancer: like to have their way. They will be subtle about it, hiding the gentle influence they have on you. They don’t necessarily mean to harm, they just like to direct situations in their favour.
Leo: just like Aries, they want to feel validated. Here, their façade is confidence. They may act bold or loud, but their core is soft and vulnerable to criticism. Above all, they want to be appreciated for who they are.
Virgo: their mind is a mess. As an earth sign, you would expect them to be logical and simple. But being ruled by Mercury is both a blessing and a curse, and they often get lost in overthinking.
Libra: they’re not great with feelings. They’re trying their best and they learned to help people, but their own feelings leave them puzzled more often than not. They need someone to be as patient with them as they are with everyone else.
Scorpio: they’re big softies. I know people (including themselves at times) like to portray them as these super edgy folks but the truth is, they need a lot of time to open up and show their more vulnerable side to people.
Sagittarius: they feel lost. They keep moving in fear of getting caught in a routine but they always question their decisions. They’re never as sure of themselves as they appear to be.
Capricorn: they’re tired. Always striving to do their best, always disappointed with themselves no matter how good their work is. They only see the flaws and things to improve, and never take the time to congratulate themselves for their hard work.
Aquarius: want to feel appreciated. They like to stand out from the crowd, but things can get lonely there. They need to be loved for who they are, even if they take pride in being different from everyone else.
Pisces: they’re smarter than you think, even when they look lost in their own world. They hide that part of themselves to strangers who underestimate them, but they notice and understand more than you know.
Those appear to be bird tracks rather than bunny tracks! Ergo, it was a bird hopping and then taking off, not a bunny getting taken away!
oh my god thank you phoenix wright
yeah those aren’t bunny tracks.
Forgive my sceptism, but why would a bird with a supposedly wide wingspan hop around in the snow in the first place when tree branches would suffice in the beginning?
Feel free to explain that.
I’ll be real I don’t know much about Phoenix Wright. But! I do know a lot about birds.
The mighty ptarmagin! Practically a feathered rabbit, these magnificent creatures are built for the snow.
Look at those boots! Wonderfully feathered. They spend most of their time as little snow lumps.
In fact, they’re very well known for the above phenomenon.
everytime u see a old photo of a snazzy 1920s dude in a suit remember what lurks beneath
okay why are you guys reblogging this and tagging it as reference do you plan on drawing 20s gangsters in their underwear i better see these
I couldn’t help myself
To be fair, underwear that fully covers the body from neck to knees makes a lot of sense when you’re wearing a dry-clean-only suit as your everyday outfit; it prevents sweat from soiling the garment’s inner layer, and thus lets you go longer between launderings. The development of modern underwear tracks pretty much directly with the shift to washable daywear, which removes much of the need for such extensive protection.
The part that makes least sense is how it’s sleeveless and thus doesn’t protect suits from armpit sweat. Surely the armpit is one of the most important places to put this kind of undergarment? T-shirts were originally designed as an undergarment that does protect clothing from armpit sweat, but they weren’t popularized yet in the 20s.
Most union suits did indeed have full or partial sleeves; the ones pictured in the original post are more fashionable than functional, probably intended to be worn with eveningwear.
Wow this was informative
Eveningwear? So… this is 1920s men’s lingerie. GTK
Because no one in prison is there because they’re, like, criminals responsible for their own actions or anything.
Let’s just assume that people in prison actually deserve to be there. Which is a HUGE assumption, some 5% of cases send people to jail even though THEY COMMITTED NO CRIME, not to mention plea deals which send people to prison who might not otherwise have gone if our courts and lawyers had more resources and time to fight the case. Never mind all the people forced to some sort of crime because of poverty or the countless people who committed victimless drug crimes or other like crimes rotting in prisons.
Forget about all that, and just assume that they all deserve to be incarcerated. And as a society we have decided it best to give them the option, sit here in this jail cell, in an American prison (which is incredibly dangerous for all sorts of reasons) OR you can leave, and fight fire for .26 cents an hour. You get money that you can’t spend outside the prison and job training you can’t use once you get out. But not only that, firefighting is dangerous and arduous work.
But if we’re not giving these people a leg up on the outside by letting them save money, or use their job training on the outside, then what’s the point? Other than free labor and more hands on the fire line. American prisons don’t care about rehabilitation, but they’ll take all the free labor they can get.
Now consider that a significant chunck of people in prison would probably be better served through other forms of intervention. Be it substance abuse classes, mental health care, or just job and life skills training, but instead they get to dig ditches and risk their lives for $5 a day they can’t spend outside the prison. If we lock people up for little justification, do very little to help them once in, and even less once out, but work them to death while they’re serving their time, how is that anything but slavery?
If you were serving time for something minor and were asked if you’d rather fight fires or waste away in your cell, you’d say yes too probably. And when you got done risking your life and all you got was a few dollars worth of candy/chips/basic necessities from the commissary, and couldn’t even work as a firefighter when it was all said and done, you’d feel like a slave too. And it would be justified, because that’s basically what you were and that’s basically what thousands of prisoners risking their lives to keep people safe are right now.
funeral-biscuit 